Doc styling (#8067)

* Important files

* Styling them all

* Revert "Styling them all"

This reverts commit 7d029395fdae8513b8281cbc2a6c239f8093503e.

* Syling them for realsies

* Fix syntax error

* Fix benchmark_utils

* More fixes

* Fix modeling auto and script

* Remove new line

* Fixes

* More fixes

* Fix more files

* Style

* Add FSMT

* More fixes

* More fixes

* More fixes

* More fixes

* Fixes

* More fixes

* More fixes

* Last fixes

* Make sphinx happy
This commit is contained in:
Sylvain Gugger
2020-10-26 18:26:02 -04:00
committed by GitHub
parent 04a17f8550
commit 08f534d2da
271 changed files with 9726 additions and 8991 deletions

View File

@@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ The abstract from the paper is the following:
better performance than pretraining approaches based on autoregressive language modeling. However, relying on
corrupting the input with masks, BERT neglects dependency between the masked positions and suffers from a
pretrain-finetune discrepancy. In light of these pros and cons, we propose XLNet, a generalized autoregressive
pretraining method that (1) enables learning bidirectional contexts by maximizing the expected likelihood over
all permutations of the factorization order and (2) overcomes the limitations of BERT thanks to its autoregressive
formulation. Furthermore, XLNet integrates ideas from Transformer-XL, the state-of-the-art autoregressive model,
into pretraining. Empirically, under comparable experiment settings, XLNet outperforms BERT on 20 tasks, often by
a large margin, including question answering, natural language inference, sentiment analysis, and document ranking.*
pretraining method that (1) enables learning bidirectional contexts by maximizing the expected likelihood over all
permutations of the factorization order and (2) overcomes the limitations of BERT thanks to its autoregressive
formulation. Furthermore, XLNet integrates ideas from Transformer-XL, the state-of-the-art autoregressive model, into
pretraining. Empirically, under comparable experiment settings, XLNet outperforms BERT on 20 tasks, often by a large
margin, including question answering, natural language inference, sentiment analysis, and document ranking.*
Tips: